"They're a good hockey team and I think we've got a good hockey team, but we can be better in a lot of areas right now."
The Capitals learned Saturday that playing well for one period, or most of one period, isn't going to be enough to beat the Penguins. They managed all of 10 shots on goal through the first two periods while the Penguins had 28.
That was mostly because the Penguins had the puck most of the time. The Capitals were sloppy coming through the neutral zone and made it too easy for Pittsburgh's defensemen when they were breaking out of their zone with the puck.
"We didn't manage the puck, we didn't place it in the right areas and so we'd get to the red line and it was just really easy for them to break out and have some speed and play in our end a little bit more than we wanted them to," Trotz said. "I just didn't think we executed well enough, which I said the other game; I don't think we were as urgent on the puck. The puck battles weren't as crisp, and when you're turning pucks over in the neutral zone, you're feeding their game."
The Capitals have talked about playing a puck-possession game to wear down the Penguins in their end and prevent them from utilizing their speed and skill in the transition game, but they've done that only for brief stretches. They've wanted to punish the Penguins defensemen physically after they make their breakout passes to make it more difficult for them to join the rush and also wear them down during the course of the series.
With the Penguins down to five defensemen after Olli Maatta was injured on a late Brooks Orpik hit 4:13 into the game, being physical could have been even more beneficial for the Capitals.