Any talk about the use by Chris Drury of waivers as a leverage against the no-trade clause? -- @otghockey.bsky.social
Having spent the past two days at the NHL Board of Governors meeting in South Florida, yes, the Rangers were a topic of conversation among people there, including media members. Yes, their general manager's use of waivers as leverage against the modified no-trade clause that forward Barclay Goodrow and defenseman Jacob Trouba had in their contracts was also a topic of conversation, but it was just conversation, nothing official or on the record. This might become a topic when the NHL and NHL Players' Association convene to hammer out a new Collective Bargaining Agreement, discussion that could begin shortly after Jan. 1.
Trouba said the Rangers used waivers as "a threat" to get him to agree to a trade. He eventually went to the Anaheim Ducks. Goodrow was put on waivers by the Rangers in the offseason and the San Jose Sharks claimed him. In each case, Drury was able to get those two contracts off the Rangers' books.
The key in all this is the Rangers did not break or bend rules in the CBA.
"It's my job, and 31 other GMs jobs, to try and do everything we can to help our team," Drury said Saturday. "There's things at our disposal in the CBA. I'm not trying to mess with players. I'm just trying to do the best I can to move the team forward and make changes that are necessary."
Agree or disagree with tactics, the Rangers utilized the rules in the current CBA to make these transactions possible. It's not clear now if there will be fallout from what they did that could lead to a change in the CBA or repercussions in future potential contract negotiations.