williams060618

Hello and welcome to Tweetmail, presented by our friends at
Tijuana Flats
!
Tweetmail is a weekly feature on CarolinaHurricanes.com in which I take your Twitter questions about the Carolina Hurricanes or other assorted topics and answer them in mailbag form. Hopefully the final product is insightful to some degree, and maybe we have some fun along the way.
Let's get to it.

Tweet from @GottSomeJohn: Do you see the Canes going after any free agents this summer or are the changes mostly going to be through trade? Also, who do you like in the Belmont on Saturday?
I think the most likely avenue for significant change is through trades, but I don't think the Hurricanes will sleep on free agency, either.
Why would trades yield the most advantageous return? The Hurricanes have valuable assets that they're willing to at least shop around. Recall majority owner Tom Dundon in his end-of-season news conference: "There's none of them I'm not trying to replace. I want a better player than every one of them. That's our job. … We're not finding better players than Sebastian Aho. We're just not. We're not finding harder workers or more committed hockey players." Trading value is going to yield value in return, so that's where I think the greatest changes could be made.
Free agency is going to be more of a gamble, considering there could be 31 teams vying for the services of a single player. The Hurricanes will be able to make a compelling pitch - helping a team take that next step with a new head coach in a desirable market to live in - but will they be competitive in dollar amount and term to seal the deal and potentially land a more marquee name? That's the biggest unknown.
So, I'd look to trades to be the harbinger of change, but don't completely discount July 1, either.
As far as horse racing goes, I admit I saw neither the Kentucky Derby nor the Preakness this year. And I wouldn't really know much beyond that anyway. But I'll certainly root for Justify to take home the Triple Crown.
Tweet from @DaneFrazier: Will there be a main captain before the next season starts?
Yes, I think it's extremely safe to say that the Hurricanes will have a singular captain prior to the start of the season.
Head coach Rod Brind'Amour, a former captain of the team himself, touched on leadership in the room during his
introductory news conference
:
"We get hung up on letters and A's, but we need lots of leaders in that room. I keep going back - a lot of people don't want to talk about the past and this and that, but that's where I'm drawing all of my experience from. When we were good here, he had a bunch of guys who would lead. It didn't matter who was wearing a C or an A. Everyone has to be a leader in that room."
While the Hurricanes will be looking to draw on the leadership from a collection of players in the room, I do expect the more traditional captaincy arrangement this season, something that will be likely sorted out in training camp.

It was a day too early last week to use this question, so I'm resurrecting it for this week.
As announced/confirmed on Thursday, the Hurricanes will indeed be introducing a new third jersey for the 2018-19 season. And you won't have to wait long to see it! The jersey will be unveiled at the
Draft Party
on Friday, June 22 at Raleigh Beer Garden. The event, which is free to attend, begins at 6 p.m., and the jersey will be revealed within that hour before draft coverage begins at 7 p.m.
If you haven't already, make plans to be at Raleigh Beer Garden that night. Between the jersey unveiling and the second overall selection, it's sure to be an exciting Friday evening.
Speaking of …

Ok, sure. I'll play along.
Fish biscuit.

Yep! Went to see it opening weekend. I enjoyed it! It was a fun summer film with enough twists and turns and surprises to give the plot enough intrigue and forward motion. I thought Donald Glover absolutely nailed his role as a young Lando Calrissian, and, for as much as I prepared for the worst, Alden Ehrenreich was actually pretty good as Han Solo. Without spoiling any plot points (and setting aside box office performance), I think the film sets up a number of stories worth exploring further.
Ranking "Star Wars" films seems to be A Thing, so I'd say "Solo" was my least favorite "Star Wars" film in the Disney era. That doesn't mean it was bad. It wasn't. It's still better than the prequels. I just enjoyed Episodes VII and VIII and "Rogue One" more.
TV's Mike Maniscalco and I will have a spoiler-filled discussion of "Solo" on
CanesCast
in the coming weeks!
\\*
Join me next week for more questions and more answers!
If you have a question you'd like answered or you want to discuss that cameo in "Solo," you can find me on Twitter at
@MSmithCanes
or drop an email
here
.