Plus: Jaccob Slavin returns
What a difference having Jaccob Slavin back in the lineup makes, right? That shouldn't be a surprise, though, considering Slavin is one of the elite defensemen in the National Hockey League.
"It's awesome to get back out there and battle with the guys. They've been battling hard this whole series," Slavin said. "We got a huge win. That's all that matters."
After missing the last three games with a lower-body injury, Slavin returned and logged a game-high 26:08 of ice time. He chipped in an assist on Necas' game-tying goal in the third period and added two hits and a blocked shot. Slavin now has 14 points (1g, 13a) in 25 career playoff games, the most points in franchise history by a defenseman in his first 25 postseason games.
Minus: What is goaltender interference?
Anyone? Anyone?
Staal seemed to have tied the game at two in the second period, a point shot that ricocheted off his skate and in, but after a coach's challenge from Nashville, the goal was wiped off the board. Why? Here's the official explanation from the NHL's Situation Room:
"Carolina's Warren Foegele impaired Juuse Saros's ability to play his position in the crease prior to Jordan Staal's goal. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 69.1 which states, in part, 'Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper's ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal.'"
But you be the judge.
!
Saros had to get to his left to make the save, but it's not Foegele who prevents him from moving laterally - it's Roman Josi, his own defenseman.
Let Brind'Amour take it from here.
"I get why they called goalie interference. Foegs was there initially. And had that shot come initially, I think it's goalie interference, but it didn't come initially. Then, [Foegele] gets out and their guy (Josi) clearly pushes him and interferes with the goalie. It's not our guy. There's no chance [Saros] is making that save anyway," he said. "There needs to be a little more common sense on that in my opinion. It's clearly their guy preventing the goalie from making the save, not our guy. That's my take on it. I got a different explanation on it. It is what it is."
It is what it is, indeed.